Analysis - Global Trade Alert

Executing Trump’s campaign pledges on tariffs won’t restore manufacturing in the Rust Belt—or elsewhere for that matter

cBrief 4: Game On

Many American politicians contend that Chinese imports delivered a blow to manufacturing jobs, especially in the Rust Belt states. President Trump wants to fix the employment loss by raising import tariffs. Simulating the job, wage, and inflation effects of his three most prominent campaign pledges for tariffs on the politically sensitive manufacturing sector reveals clear policy trade-offs. Hitting Chinese imports with 60% tariffs achieves most of the intended manufacturing job creation but the employment gains come at the expense of considerable inflation-adjusted household losses. Targeting Canadian and Mexican imports in addition creates few new manufacturing jobs and reduces inflation-adjusted wages much more. Many manufacturing firms use foreign parts and components, so subjecting all U.S. imports to higher tariffs yields no extra jobs but does raise the cost of living further. Swing-state Rust Belt locations realize little benefit following each tariff hike.

Simon Evenett 20 Jan 2025

What's New

Spotlight

Executing Trump’s campaign pledges on tariffs won’t restore manufacturing in the Rust Belt—or elsewhere for that matter

From Blind Spots to Insights: Enhancing Geopolitical Radar to Guide Global Business

Why Bilateral Threats, not a Global Tariff, are the Way Forward

All Analyses

Executing Trump’s campaign pledges on tariffs won’t restore manufacturing in the Rust Belt—or elsewhere for that matter

From Blind Spots to Insights: Enhancing Geopolitical Radar to Guide Global Business

Access to the Chinese Market: An Obsolescing Bargain?

Are Chinese exports causing a protectionist backlash? Is it time to switch sourcing to ASEAN?

Red Alert: Is China's recent export growth so exceptional that foreign officials & corporate executives should be losing sleep?

Make It Here in the USA! What the track record of attracting FDI into the United States implies for the Next Administration

“Why should trade agreements last forever? Nothing else does.” On the perils of negotiating with the next U.S. Administration

Why Bilateral Threats, not a Global Tariff, are the Way Forward

American Tariff Threats & Foreign Retaliation: No escape from macroeconomic reality

Crossfire: The U.S. Trade Surplus in Services As America Contemplates An Inward Turn

Carbon Copies? Suspicious patterns of commercial and industrial policy response by the behemoths of world trade

How many swallows make a summer? Sectoral evidence of China’s export recovery