China: Longer visa duration for highly skilled foreign workers

Measure #1153 | Published 9 Feb 2010 ▲

Description

From 1 July 2009, the City of Shanghai allows extended residence of certain foreign talent. Under the new regime, foreigners may now apply for visas of up to 5 years instead of a single year.

 

Workers that fall under one of the following six categories qualify for the extended visa:

  1. A foreigner who is recipient of “honorary citizen of Shanghai”, “magnolia award” or “award of magnolia honors”.
  2. A foreigner who is province (municipality) level special talent or celebrity.
  3. Academic or scientific research leader or researcher or teacher having vice-senior title or above who is employed by a state-level or province (ministry)-level research institution or a key institution of higher learning.
  4. Legal representative, managing director, vice managing director or chief financial officer of a new and high-tech enterprise, foreign-invested enterprise in the encouraged category, foreign-invested advanced technology enterprise or foreign-invested product exporting enterprise.
  5. Legal representative, managing director, vice managing director or chief financial officer of Shanghai regional headquarters, research and development center or investment company of a transnational corporation.
  6. Legal representative, managing director, vice managing director or chief financial officer of an enterprise with the registered capital of more than 3 million USD.

Any Evidence-Based Deliberation:

Question Result
Is there anything in the public record to suggest that evidence of the effectiveness of the proposed measure was considered during official deliberations?
Is there any evidence that alternatives to the proposed measure were considered?
Is there anything in the public record that suggests that empirical evidence informed the comparison across the alternatives available to government?
Was such evidence identified?
Is such evidence publicly available?
Did the official decision-maker in question provide an explanation as to why a chosen measure was favoured over alternatives?
Is there any evidence to suggest that potentially affected trading partners were consulted before the measures were taken?
Is there any evidence that safeguards have been put in place to ensure that implementation of the initiative is transparent and non-discriminatory?
Did the government state its intention to review the measure within one year of implementation?

Implementing Jurisdiction:

Affected Trading Partners:

Measure type:

Affected Sectors:

Affected Tariff Lines:

(mouse over for more info)

Date Discovered:

Implemented: Yes

Date of inception: 1 Jul 2009

GTA Evaluation: Green

Source:

Police of New Pudong Area, Shanghai. (7 January 2010). Seven new policies of exit-entry administration for foreign talents and investors in Pudong New Area. Available at http://zjs.police.pudong.gov.cn/docsqlwc/detail.asp?UnitDm=150600&backty...

Government Response:

Glossary of trade terms